Legal Opinion

Hancock v. Aetna Life Insurance Co.

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided May 3, 2017No. CASE NO. C16-1697JLRPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT

JAMES L. ROB ART, United States District Judge

I. INTRODUCTION

Before the court is Defendants Aetna Life Insurance Company (“Aetna”), the *1365Boeing Company Employee Health and Welfare Plan (Plan 503) (“Plan 503”), and Employee Benefit Plans Committee’s (“the Committee”) (collectively, “Defendants”) motion for partial summary judgment. (Mot. (Dkt. #26).) Ms. Hancock opposes Defendants’ motion. (Resp. (Dkt. #28).) The court has considered the motion, the parties’ submissions in opposition to- and support of the motion, the relevant portions of the…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  5. Varity Corp. v. HoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1996

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Chapin v. The Prudential Insurance Company of AmericaDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2021
  2. Davis v. United Health Group IncorporatedDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2023
  3. Witt v. Intel Corporation Long-Term Disability PlanDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API