Hancock v. Aetna Life Insurance Co.
District Court, W.D. Washington
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT
JAMES L. ROB ART, United States District Judge
I. INTRODUCTION
Before the court is Defendants Aetna Life Insurance Company (“Aetna”), the *1365Boeing Company Employee Health and Welfare Plan (Plan 503) (“Plan 503”), and Employee Benefit Plans Committee’s (“the Committee”) (collectively, “Defendants”) motion for partial summary judgment. (Mot. (Dkt. #26).) Ms. Hancock opposes Defendants’ motion. (Resp. (Dkt. #28).) The court has considered the motion, the parties’ submissions in opposition to- and support of the motion, the relevant portions of the…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Varity Corp. v. HoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Chapin v. The Prudential Insurance Company of AmericaDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2021
- Davis v. United Health Group IncorporatedDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2023
- Witt v. Intel Corporation Long-Term Disability PlanDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2024