Legal Opinion
Schuman v. Microchip Tech. Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided February 6, 2018No. Case No.16–cv–05544–HSGPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS
Re: Dkt. No. 33
HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR., United States District Judge *1107Pending before the Court is a motion to dismiss by Defendants Microchip Technology, Inc. ("Microchip"), Atmel Corp. ("Atmel"), and Atmel Corp. U.S. Severance Guarantee Benefit Program ("the Atmel Plan" or "the Plan"). Dkt. No. 33. For the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART the motion.1
I. BACKGROUND
A. Factual Allegations
Plaintiffs Peter Schuman and William Coplin are former employees of Atmel and Microchip, as well as…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Manzarek v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Doe v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2018
- B. v. Anthem Blue Cross Life and Health Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2024
- Efimenko v. The Catalina Marketing Corporation Group Life PlanDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2022
- Phillips v. Boilermaker-Blacksmith National Pension TrustDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2023