Legal Opinion
Tavilla v. Cephalon, Inc.
District Court, D. Arizona
Decided May 3, 2012No. CV-11-00270-PHX-DGCPublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
DAVID G. CAMPBELL, District Judge.
Defendant Cephalon, Inc. (“Cephalon”) filed a motion for summary judgment in this product liability suit on the basis that Plaintiffs’ claims are time barred by the two year statute of limitations found in A.R.S. § 12-542. Doe. 75. The motion has been fully briefed, and neither party has requested oral argument. Docs. 78, 81. Plaintiffs also filed a motion to strike Defendants’ additional statement of facts in support of its reply (Doc. 84) and a motion to file an amended complaint adding causes of action for fraud (Doc. 85). These motions have been…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Marilyn Miller v. Rykoff-Sexton, Inc., and Atlas Hotels, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- In re Arizona Theranos, Inc., LitigationDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2017
- In re Ariz. Theranos, Inc., Litig.District Court, D. Arizona · 2018
- Ahern v. Apple Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2019
- Bathworks Enterprises LLC v. ReBath LLCDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2026
- Birjette Whicker, et al. v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2026
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.