People v. Breen
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Wayne; Van Zile, J. Dennis Breen and Robert McKnight were convicted of breaking and entering an office in the nighttime with intent to commit larceny.
1Opinion of the CourtOstrander, J.
(after stating the facts). 1. Technically, the question asked the witness Mueller was objectionable in assuming that he was guilty of or believed or supposed he was suspected of having committed crimes other than those he had himself referred to. The purpose of the question, i. e., to learn his attitude toward the police, and perhaps to show that he had a motive in assisting the police and in securing the conviction of respondents, was a proper one. In my opinion, the obvious purpose of the question was accomplished, considering the answer which was given, with the admissions of criminal…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Knowles v. PeopleMichigan Supreme Court · 1867
- Cole v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1893
- Fraser v. HaggertyMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
- O'Rourke v. O'RourkeMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
- Argabright v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. GriffinSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1924
- People v. CammarataMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
- Barrett v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1950
- State v. PapitsasNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1963
- Thurman v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1947
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.