Legal Opinion

State Bank v. Jeltz

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided October 6, 1917No. 21,082PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Reno district court; FRANK F. PRIGG, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Burch, J.:

The action was one to recover on a promissory note, and for application of the proceeds of the sale of chattel security. From an adverse judgment one of the makers of the note appeals.

Jeltz was a persistent borrower from the bank. On May 1, 1915, a renewal note for $1768 was given to the bank, signed by Jeltz, and signed by Wm. Peoples, the appealing defendant, as makers. Peoples has since died and is now represented by his administratrix. The note was secured by a chattel mortgage given by Jeltz. On May 15, Jeltz borrowed more money of the…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Spire v. SpireSupreme Court of Kansas · 1919
  2. Lonnon v. BatchmanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1918
  3. Conqueror Trust Co. v. DanforthSupreme Court of Kansas · 1918
  4. Severy State Bank v. HoytSupreme Court of Kansas · 1918
  5. H. D. Lee Mercantile Co. v. Mercantile Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API