Legal Opinion

Speer v. Speer

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 20, 1989No. 88-220PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Steele Hays, Justice.

This appeal has been certified to us under Rule 29(1 )(p) as involving the construction of a deed. It is the second appeal of a divorce case between Harold Speer, appellant, and Carolyn Speer. The parties were divorced by a decree entered in 1985, from which Harold Speer appealed. The Court of Appeals affirmed on direct appeal and modified and remanded on cross-appeal. See Speer v. Speer, 18 Ark. App. 186 (1986). Carolyn Speer died while that appeal was in process and her interest was pursued by her father as special administrator.

Harold Speer’s contentions in the first…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Dixon v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1977
  2. HCA Health Services of Midwest, Inc. v. National Bank of CommerceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
  3. Strickland v. StricklandSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1906
  4. Wingfield v. PageSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1983
  5. Owen v. OwenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1945

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Ginsburg v. GinsburgSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
  2. Crowder v. CrowderSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
  3. Cawood v. SmithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
  4. Wooley v. Planter's Cotton Oil Mill, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2005
  5. Nash v. NashCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2019

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API