Legal Opinion

Ginsburg v. Ginsburg

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided June 26, 2003No. 02-707PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ray Thornton, Justice.

Appellants, George T. Ginsburg, Mildred Ginsburg Baron, and William Mack Ginsburg, appeal the Garland County Probate Court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of appellee, Phyllis Ginsburg, the wife of A1 Ginsburg, who died intestate, and the administratrix of his estate. At issue is a transfer-on-death account (“TOD account”) established by the decedent naming appellants, his children from a former marriage, as the beneficiaries. We reverse the trial court’s grant of summary judgment, and we remand with instructions.

On May 9, 1987, appellee and the decedent were…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Harasyn v. St. Paul Guardian InsuranceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
  2. Wood v. WoodSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1894
  3. Hamilton v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
  4. BPS, INC. v. ParkerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
  5. Laird v. ShelnutSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Castaneda v. Progressive Classic InsuranceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2004
  2. Harvest Rice, Inc. v. Fritz & Mertice Lehman Elevator & Dryer, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2006
  3. Ginsburg v. GinsburgSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2004
  4. Collins v. MorganCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2005
  5. Moody v. TarvinCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2016

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API