Legal Opinion
Wingfield v. Page
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided January 31, 1983No. 82-198PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Robert H. Dudley, Justice.
Appellants Wingfield, house builders, constructed a house in a subdivision they w'ere developing in Benton. In May, 1979, they executed a contract to sell the previously unoccupied house to the appellees Page for $52,600. The contract contained the following provision:
13. INSPECTION AND REPAIRS: Buyer certifies that Buyer has inspected the property and is not relying upon any warranties, representations or statements of Agent or Seller as to age or condition of improvements, other than those specified herein. 13A and 13B do not apply to new previously unoccupied…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Wawak v. StewartSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1970
- Johnson v. HealySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
- Blagg v. Fred Hunt Company, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1981
- Carter v. QuickSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1978
- Steed v. BusbySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1980
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Jim Halsey Co., Inc. v. BonarSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1985
- O'MARA v. DykemaSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
- Curry v. ThornsberrySupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
- John Cheeseman Trucking, Inc. v. DouganSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
- Dovers v. Stephenson Oil Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.