Legal Opinion

Tucker v. Dickey

District Court, W.D. Wisconsin

Decided July 23, 1985No. 84-C-653-CPublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CRABB, Chief Judge.

This is a civil case in which plaintiff seeks monetary damages, injunctive and declaratory relief for alleged violations of his rights under the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments. The case is before the court on the parties’ cross motions for summary judgment. There is jurisdiction over plaintiff’s constitutional claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and 28 U.S.C. § 1343.

Defendants have submitted a brief and proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law in support of their motion for summary judgment. In a letter dated March 9, 1985, plaintiff indicated that he was unable to put…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Hudson v. PalmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. People v. RobertsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Jerry K. Forbes v. Clarence Trigg, SuperintendentCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
  3. Railway Labor Executives' Ass'n v. BurnleyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
  4. Feliciano v. City of ClevelandDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1987
  5. United States v. Freddie B. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API