Legal Opinion

State, Lake Minnetonka Conservation District v. Horner

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 12, 2000No. C5-99-1027PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BLATZ, Chief Justice.

The state brings this appeal of the district court’s pretrial order to suppress evidence of intoxication and dismiss operating a watercraft while under the influence charges. The state argues that special deputies of the Hennepin County Sheriffs Department, Water Patrol, have authority to investigate the charges as peace officers or as private citizens, and thus their investigation of respondent was authorized and the evidence of intoxication should not be excluded. Alternatively, the state argues that probable cause to arrest respondent existed before the special…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. State, Department of Public Safety v. JuncewskiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  3. Sorenson v. St. Paul Ramsey Medical CenterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  4. State Ex Rel. Rasmussen v. TahashSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
  5. State v. CarlsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. State v. KoppiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
  2. John Hugh Gilmore v. City of MinneapolisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2016
  3. Chafoulias v. PetersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
  4. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
  5. State of Minnesota v. Jose Martin Lugo, Jr.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2016

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API