Chafoulias v. Peterson
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HANSON, Justice.
Appellant Gus A. Chafoulias brings this defamation action against respondent media company ABC, Inc., and respondent attorney Lori C. Peterson, alleging that ABC published a defamatory statement made by Peterson. We review the decision of the district court, affirmed by the court of appeals, that Chafoulias was a limited purpose public figure on the date of the publication and that respondents are therefore entitled to summary judgment because a reasonable jury could not conclude by clear and convincing evidence that either ABC or Peterson acted with actual malice. We…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Bose Corp. v. Consumers Union of United States, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- St. Amant v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Gary v. CrouchCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2005
- Marriage of Rubey v. VannettSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
- Cottrell v. NAT. COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC ASS'NSupreme Court of Alabama · 2007
- Stepnes v. RitschelCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
- Maethner v. Someplace Safe, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2019
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.