Legal Opinion

People v. Romero

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided November 24, 1975No. 26189PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

MR. JUSTICE ERICKSON.

The issues on appeal include claims of ineffective assistance of counsel, insufficiency of evidence, prosecutorial misconduct, and failure to properly instruct the jury. We affirm.

Felix Romero, the defendant-appellant, and his co-defendants, Gilbert Rucobo and Salavador Morones, were convicted of conspiracy to commit first-degree burglary. C.R.S. 1963, 40-2-201; 1 40-4-202. 2 Romero’s co-defendants were additionally convicted of attempted burglary in the first degree. C.R.S. 1963, 40-2-101; 3 40-4-202. 4 All three defendants were represented by one…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. United States v. Carl Lovano and Peter GenovaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970
  3. Leick v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1958
  4. People v. MacKeySupreme Court of Colorado · 1974
  5. Bizup v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1962

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Armstrong v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1985
  2. Watson v. DISTRICT COURT IN & FOR FOURTH JUD.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1980
  3. People v. ArmstrongColorado Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. People v. ArmstrongColorado Court of Appeals · 1982
  5. People v. WoodColorado Court of Appeals · 1992

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API