Legal Opinion

People v. Armstrong

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided December 9, 1982No. 81CA0353PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STERNBERG, Judge.

The defendant, Herbert Armstrong, was convicted by a jury of conspiracy to commit robbery, aggravated robbery, second-degree kidnapping, aggravated motor vehicle theft, and second-degree burglary. He contends the charges should have been dismissed because the indictment was returned by a biased grand jury, and that his attorney’s joint representation of two defendants denied him effective assistance of counsel. We find both arguments to be without merit and therefore affirm the convictions.

I

Armstrong claims undue and improper prosecutorial influence over the grand jury denied…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Cuyler v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. United States v. Albert Juan NunezCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1982
  3. James J. Laughlin v. United States of America, Allan U. Forte v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967
  4. People v. GableColorado Court of Appeals · 1982
  5. People v. SummersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1979

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Armstrong v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1985
  2. People v. BergenColorado Court of Appeals · 1994
  3. People v. ArmstrongColorado Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. People v. BergenColorado Court of Appeals · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API