Legal Opinion

People v. Armstrong

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided May 23, 1983No. 81CA0354PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STERNBERG, Judge.

In a joint trial with her husband, defendant Ann Armstrong, was found guilty of conspiracy to commit aggravated robbery. She appeals and we affirm.

Defendant and her husband were indicted for conspiracy to commit aggravated robbery. Her husband was also indicted for aggravated robbery, second-degree kidnapping, and three other offenses arising out of the same events. Defendant’s involvement in the scheme was allegedly based upon a telephone call placed to the manager of a personal storage warehouse, which was intended to lure him from his home directly above the storage area.…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Cuyler v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Harris v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Holloway v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. United States v. HavensSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Armstrong v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1985
  2. People v. HamerColorado Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. People v. ReyherColorado Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. People v. VigilColorado Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. James Lucas Salazar v. Lou Hesse Gale A. Norton, Attorney General of the State of ColoradoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API