Legal Opinion
Jaggers v. Merchants Indemnity Corp.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided February 23, 1954No. Civ. No. 918-51PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEANEY, District Judge.
This case has been submitted to the court on an agreed set of facts. Counsel have stipulated that plaintiff herein *23was covered by an insurance policy issued by defendant which provided, inter alia, that under “Coverage A — Bodily Injury Liability” plaintiff was insured against liability imposed by law in the amount of $10,000 for each person, and $20,000 for each accident; and under “Coverage B — Property Damage Liability” for each accident in the amount of $5,000.
While this policy was in effect and covered an automobile owned by plaintiff, an accident occurred…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Schneider v. New Amsterdam Cas. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952
- McAllister v. CENTURY INDEM. CO., HARTFORD, CONN.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1953
- Burstein v. United States Lines Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943
- Fryer v. Mount Holly Water Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1915
- Metzler v. LONDON GUARANTEE AND ACC. CO., LTD.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Napier v. BanksOhio Court of Appeals · 1967
- Holtz v. Mutual Service Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
- Pittman v. FowlerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1966
- Wohlberg v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.District Court, D. Montana · 1967
- Continental Insurance v. Clayton Hardtop SkiffDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1965