Legal Opinion
Schneider v. New Amsterdam Cas. Co.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided October 23, 1952PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
22 N.J. Super. 238 (1952)
92 A.2d 66
BEATRICE SCHNEIDER, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
NEW AMSTERDAM CASUALTY COMPANY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued October 6, 1952.
Decided October 23, 1952.
Before Judges EASTWOOD, GOLDMANN and FRANCIS.
Mr. William H.D. Cox argued the cause for the appellant (Messrs. Cox & Walburg, attorneys).
Mr. Edward J. Abromson argued the cause for the respondent.
GOLDMANN, J.A.D.
Plaintiff brought an action in the Essex County District Court to recover for property loss under an insurance policy issued to her by defendant. Judgment in the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Harris v. American Casualty Co. of ReadingSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1912
- Caruso v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1948
- Nuzzi v. United States Casualty Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1938
- Jorgenson v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1947
- Lower v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1933
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Royal Ins. Co. v. Rutgers Cas.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1994
- Boswell v. Travelers Indemnity Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
- Kook v. American Sur. Co. of NYNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1965
- Mahon v. American Cas. Co. of ReadingNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961
- Minkov v. RELIANCE INS. CO. OF PHILANew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1959
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.