Legal Opinion

Fryer v. Mount Holly Water Co.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided March 29, 1915PublishedCited by 7 opinions

On motion to strike out answer.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Bergen, J.

This action was brought to recover damages which Grace Fryer, an infant, suffered, because, as she alleges, the defendant, engaged in the business of furnishing water for domestic use, and for a consideration undertaking to supply water which would be reasonably pure and wholesome, negligently performed its undertaking so that she contracted a disease resulting from the furnishing of impure water, and also by William S. Fryer, her father, as joint complainant, for the loss of the services of his daughter, and for money expended to restore,her…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Schnebly Ex Rel. Schnebly v. BakerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1974
  2. Higgins v. SchneiderNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1960
  3. Jaggers v. Merchants Indemnity Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1954
  4. Cliff v. Seligman & LatzCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1930
  5. Wagner v. MacHettoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1950

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API