Legal Opinion
Metzler v. LONDON GUARANTEE AND ACC. CO., LTD.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided July 10, 1952PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
20 N.J. Super. 497 (1952)
90 A.2d 81
WALTER METZLER, AN INFANT, BY HIS GUARDIAN AD LITEM MAURICE METZLER, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
LONDON GUARANTEE AND ACCIDENT COMPANY, LIMITED, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued June 30, 1952.
Decided July 10, 1952.
Before Judges EASTWOOD, STEIN and CLEARY.
Mr. Heyman Zimel argued the cause for the plaintiff-respondent. Messrs. Harry S. La Poff and Heyman Zimel, attorneys.
Mr. John F. Leonard argued the cause for the defendant-appellant.
The opinion of the court was delivered by EASTWOOD, S.J.A.D.
This is an appeal by…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- James v. Federal Insurance Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1950
- Kindervater v. Motorists Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1938
- Kupfersmith v. Delaware InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1913
- Caruso v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1948
- Clark v. WarnerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Dzurko v. Pilot Life InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
- Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York v. Carll & Ramagosa, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1965
- Jaggers v. Merchants Indemnity Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1954
- Graser v. Mutual of Omaha InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1966