Legal Opinion

Western Blind & Screen Co. v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided February 25, 1919No. 1920PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, G. A. 8162 (T. D. 37614). [Oral argument Jan. 16,1919, by Mr. Lane and Mr. Hanson.]

1Opinion of the CourtBarber, Judge

This case involves a classification of cotton ladder tapes under the tariff act of 1913. They are identical with the merchandise considered in this court in Burlington Venetian Blind Co. v. United States (1 Ct. Cust. Appls., 374; T. D. 31456); United States v. Burlington Venetian Blind Co. (3 Ct. Cust. Appls., 378; T. D. 32967); and United States v. Walter et al. (4 Ct. Cust. Appls., 95; T. D. 33371).

In all these cases the question was presented whether they were classifiable as cotton tapes or as manufactures of cotton under the tariff act of 1909. In the first case, as the issue was made,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. WalterCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913
  2. United States v. Burlington Venetian Blind Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912
  3. Burlington Venetian Blind Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Alfred Kohlberg, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1939
  2. Bamberger v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1929
  3. Cohn v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1937
  4. Curtis & Von Bernuth Mfg. Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1935
  5. Ropa Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1939

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API