Legal Opinion

In re Estate of Cannon

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 12, 1897No. 2680PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, Spokane County.—Hon. "W. E. Richardson, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Scott, C. J.

The appeal herein was taken by H. E. Houghton, executor of said estates. Pending such appeal, upon the suggestion of the death of said Houghton, "W. M. Ridpath was substituted.

It appears that on the 8th day of September, 1893, and for a long time prior thereto, A. M. Cannon and Jennie E. Cannon were husband and wife, residing in this state. They became possessed of a large amount of community property and incurred a large community indebtedness. Each of them had been married prior to their intermarriage, and each had children by such prior…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Johnston v. S.F. Savings UnionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  2. In re the Estate of HeydenfeldtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Ryan v. FergussonWashington Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Newman v. CooperSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1896

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Cairns v. DonaheyWashington Supreme Court · 1910
  2. In Re Maher's EstateWashington Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Thompson v. WeimerWashington Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Agnew v. AgnewSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1928
  5. In re the Estate of BernardCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API