Legal Opinion

Dietz v. Kautzman

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided June 7, 2004No. 20030361PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VANDE WALLE, Chief Justice.

[¶ 1] Robert A. Kautzman appealed from an order imposing sanctions against him and his attorney, Jonathan Garaas and the Garaas Law Firm, for filing a frivolous motion and requiring them to pay Rachel M. Dietz $3,000 for attorney fees incurred by her in defending the motion. We hold the trial court did not abuse its discretion in imposing sanctions, and we affirm.

I

[¶ 2] This case involves a divorce action which was initiated in 1995. This is the seventh appeal to this Court in a long line of litigation involving the trial court’s property division and award of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Barber v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
  2. Peterson v. ZerrNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Williams v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Napoleon Livestock Auction, Inc. v. RohrichNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
  5. In Re Estate of DionNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Strand v. Cass CountyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Buri v. RamseyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Simpson v. Chicago Pneumatic Tool Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Grasser v. GrasserNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
  5. Dietz v. KautzmanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API