Dietz v. Kautzman
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
VANDE WALLE, Chief Justice.
[¶ 1] Robert A. Kautzman appealed from an order imposing sanctions against him and his attorney, Jonathan Garaas and the Garaas Law Firm, for filing a frivolous motion and requiring them to pay Rachel M. Dietz $3,000 for attorney fees incurred by her in defending the motion. We hold the trial court did not abuse its discretion in imposing sanctions, and we affirm.
I
[¶ 2] This case involves a divorce action which was initiated in 1995. This is the seventh appeal to this Court in a long line of litigation involving the trial court’s property division and award of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Barber v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Peterson v. ZerrNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
- Williams v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
- Napoleon Livestock Auction, Inc. v. RohrichNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
- In Re Estate of DionNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Strand v. Cass CountyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
- Buri v. RamseyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
- Simpson v. Chicago Pneumatic Tool Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
- Grasser v. GrasserNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
- Dietz v. KautzmanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.