Legal Opinion
Buri v. Ramsey
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided March 23, 2005No. 20040164PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MARING, Justice.
[¶ 1] James and Rhonda Ramsey (“Ramseys”) appeal from a trial court judgment against them awarding damages to Gene Buri for conversion. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand for further proceedings in accordance with our opinion.
I
[¶ 2] In August 2002, the Ramseys agreed to purchase a parcel of land from Peter and Helen Weninger (“Weningers”). A handwritten condition included in the purchase agreement stated: ‘Wind Mill & 6 Grain Bins are not included. Seller has right to ingress & egress & have until 1 Apr 03 to Remove Bins & Wind Mill. Buyer will permit Seller To…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- National Bank of Harvey v. International Harvester Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
- Ritter, Laber & Associates, Inc. v. Koch Oil, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
- Akerlind v. BuckNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
- Krusi v. Bear, Stearns & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1983
- Christensen v. Farmers State Bank of RichardtonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1968
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Wild Rice River Estates, Inc. v. City of FargoNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
- Doeden v. StubstadNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
- B.J. Kadrmas, Inc. v. Oxbow Energy, LLCNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
- Service Oil, Inc. v. GjestvangNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
- Great Plains Royalty Corp. v. Earl Schwartz Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2021
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.