Legal Opinion
Simpson v. Chicago Pneumatic Tool Co.
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided March 8, 2005No. 20040133PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NEUMANN, Justice.
[¶ 1] Stephen and Sheri Simpson, together with their attorneys, Robert V. Bol-inske, Sr., and Charles T. Edin, appealed from a judgment dismissing the Simpsons’ claims against Chicago Pneumatic Tool Company, Johnson & Bell, Ltd., William Johnson, Dennis C. Cusack and Jerome C. Kettleson, denying their motion to compel, and awarding the defendants $17,098.42 in attorney fees, costs and disbursements as a sanction for violating N.D.R.Civ.P. 11(b). We conclude the district court did not err in denying the Simpsons’ motion to compel or in granting summary judgment dismissal of…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Expert Electric, Inc. v. LevineCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
- Rosenblit v. ZimmermanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2001
- Hofsommer v. Hofsommer Excavating, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
- Zuger v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
- Littlefield v. Union State BankNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Riverwood Commercial Park, L.L.C. v. Standard Oil Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
- Ungar v. North Dakota State UniversityNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
- Cawley v. Celeste (In Re Athens/Alpha Gas Corp.)Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2013
- Rucker v. SchmidtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
- McColl Farms, LLC v. PflaumNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.