Legal Opinion
Coulibaly v. Kerry
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided September 11, 2015No. Civil Action No. 2014-0712PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Granting in Part and Denying in Part Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss; Denying Plaintiff’s Motion For! Summary Judgment; Denying as Moot Plaintiff’s Motion to Expedite
RUDOLPH CONTRERAS, United States District Judge
I. INTRODUCTION
Dr. Tiemoko Coulibaly, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, brings this action against the Secretary of State and fifteen other individuals who are current or former employees of the U.S. Department of State: Dr. Coulibaly alleges that, by terminating his employment, Defendants violated the District of Columbia Accrued Sick and Safe 1 Leave Act, as…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Johnson v. Veterans Affairs Medical CenterDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Coulibaly v. TillersonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Graening v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc.District Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2021
- Jackson v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2026
- McCann v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2025
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.