Legal Opinion
Coulibaly v. Tillerson
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided August 29, 2017No. Civil Action No. 2014-0712PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Denying the Parties’ Cross-Motions for Summary Judgment; Denying Plaintiff’s Motions to Add Newly Acquired Evidence
RUDOLPH CONTRERAS, United States District Judge
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff Tiemoko Coulibaly, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, brings this action against the Secretary of State and fifteen other individuals who are current or former employees of the U.S. Department of State (collectively, “Defendants”). Dr. Coulibaly alleges that by firing him, Defendants violated Title I of the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993 (“FMLA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 2601-2654. The…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Phillips v. SpencerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2019
- Castillo v. Prime Hydration LLCDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2024
- Coulibaly v. KerryDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2022
- Harris v. Cnn America, Inc / Warner Media Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2026
- KLONOSKI v. WILKIEDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2020
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.