Legal Opinion
Johnston v. James River Corporation
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided June 22, 1988No. WCB 85-13546 CA A46152PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
756 P.2d 696 (1988)
91 Or.App. 721
In the matter of the Compensation of Roy M. JOHNSTON, Claimant. Roy M. Johnston, Petitioner,
v.
JAMES RIVER CORPORATION, Respondent.
WCB 85-13546; CA A46152.
Court of Appeals of Oregon.
Argued and Submitted May 11, 1988.
Decided June 22, 1988.
James L. Edmunson, Eugene, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief were Karen M. Werner and Malagon & Moore, Eugene.
Brian L. Pocock, Eugene, argued the cause and filed the brief for respondent.
Before WARDEN, P.J., and GRABER, J., and RIGGS, J. Pro Tem.
2Per curiam
In this workers' compensation case, we review under the…
3Cases cited2 opinions
- Armstrong v. Asten-Hill Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
- Johnston v. James River Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
4Cited by4 opinions
- Teledyne Wah Chang v. VorderstrasseCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
- Benninger v. Weyerhaeuser Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
- Flores v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
- Ross v. Flightcraft, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1990