Nichols v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (Ramsey Construction)
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
LORD, Senior Judge.
John Nichols, through his counsel (counsel), petitions this Court for review of a Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Board) order that affirmed a Workers’ Compensation Judge’s (WCJ) decision insofar as it awarded counsel fees for unreasonable contest on a quantum meruit basis.
Nichols suffered a work-related injury on September 19, 1994. Employer Ramsey Construction accepted liability. In her decision dated January 18, 1996, the WCJ noted that the only issue to be decided was Nichols’ request for counsel fees for an unreasonable contest. The WCJ then made the following…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Eugenie v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Piergalski v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Bandos v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board of Commonwealth v. DowlingCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Anderson v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
3Cited by3 opinions
- Ramich v. Worker's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- Young v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- Arnold v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004