Legal Opinion

State v. Richardson

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 14, 1999No. 10-97-00938; CA A98715PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, J.

Defendant appeals from a judgment of conviction for perjury, ORS 162.065, asserting that the trial court erred in proceeding without ascertaining whether defendant had voluntarily waived his right to counsel. Defendant argues, particularly, that the court was obligated to apprise defendant of the risks of self-representation before ruling on pretrial motions that he had filed pro se, but that the court failed to do so. We reverse and remand for a new trial.

On February 21,1997, defendant was arraigned. At the arraignment, the court advised defendant of the charges against him and discussed…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. MeyrickOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  2. State v. ColeOregon Supreme Court · 1996
  3. State v. CurranCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
  4. State v. MalettaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
  5. State v. ColeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  2. State v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
  3. State v. ToddCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  4. State v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
  5. State v. HainesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API