Legal Opinion

State v. Todd

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 23, 2014No. 100545057; A148667PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDuncan, P. J.

In this criminal case, defendant represented herself at trial and was convicted of several prostitution-related crimes. On appeal, she argues that her convictions should be reversed because she did not knowingly and voluntarily waive her right to counsel.1 We review for errors of law, State v. Langley, 351 Or 652, 666, 273 P3d 901 (2012), and we reverse and remand.

The procedural facts of this case are as follows. Defendant was charged by information with six counts of attempted prostitution under ORS 167.007 and ORS 161.405, and six counts of unlawful prostitution procurement activity under…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. BrownOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  2. State v. MeyrickOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  3. State v. LangleyOregon Supreme Court · 2012
  4. State v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  5. State v. ErbCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Dept. of Human Services v. J. S.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2025
  2. State v. AbbottCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2022
  3. State v. HainesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
  4. State v. GarrettCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
  5. State v. BorbaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API