Legal Opinion
Victors v. Kelsey
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 4, 1916No. Civ. No. 1586PublishedCited by 10 opinions
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtChipman, P. J.
Mandate. Petitioner is a resident of the city and county of San Francisco, a physician and surgeon of many years ’ practice. The nature of the action sufficiently appears from the following findings:
“VI.
“That in the determination of the said cause, *People of the State of California v. Frank S. Cook,’ and in preparing said cause for trial in behalf of the plaintiff therein, it became material and important to said plaintiff that certain experimental tests be made to determine whether or not certain specimens were or were not human blood stains; that the said District Attorney of the said…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- County of Yolo v. JoyceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- McFarland v. McCowenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- County of Alameda v. EversCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- McBride v. NewlinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Colusa County v. De JarnettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- County of Marin v. MessnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- Niceley v. County of MaderaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
- Thiel Detective Co. v. County of TuolumneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918
- Cunning v. CarrCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
- Carmichael v. RileyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.