County of Alameda v. Evers
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in. the opinion. Tirey L. Ford, Attorney-General, and J. J. Allen, District Attorney, for Appellant.
1Opinion of the Court
COOPER, C.
The court below sustained a demurrer to the amended complaint, and plaintiff declining further to amend, judgment was entered for defendant. This appeal is from the judgment. It appears from the complaint that defendant, as coroner, in January, 1894, presented in due form, and duly verified, a claim against the plaintiff, which claim was duly itemized, and was for certain alleged services performed by defendant in his official capacity. The claim was for the total sum of $230, and was duly passed upon and audited by the board of supervisors of the county, and a warrant ordered drawn…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Mcconoughey v. JacksonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- McFarland v. McCowenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- McBride v. NewlinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Colusa County v. De JarnettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
- County of Santa Cruz v. McPhersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- County of Yolo v. JoyceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- People v. KnottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- County of Marin v. MessnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- State ex rel. Lockwood v. TylerMontana Supreme Court · 1922
- County of Riverside v. Yawman & Erbe Manufacturing Co.California Court of Appeal · 1906
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.