Legal Opinion

State v. Alford

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 6, 1979No. 18PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUSKINS, Justice.

Defendant, an indigent, assigns as error the refusal of the trial court to appoint a private investigator for the purpose of assisting him in his defense. Defendant contends such denial of his pretrial motion for appointment of an investigator deprived him of his constitutional right to effective assistance of counsel and violated the provisions of G.S. 7A-450(b), which requires the State to provide an indigent defendant “with counsel and the other necessary expenses of representation.”

We fully considered the questions presented by this assignment in State v. Gray, 292 N.C.…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. Alderman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Brown v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Mancusi v. DeForteSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. State v. GraySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. State v. EasterlingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  2. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2002
  3. State v. GardnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  4. State v. FernandezSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1997
  5. State v. TaylorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API