Legal Opinion

Flory v. Fulton

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided February 5, 1934No. 2886Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By WILLIAMS, J.

The federal statute makes the proceeds of a loan on an adjusted service certificate not subject to seizure under any legal or equitable process. The provision is §618, Part V, Chapter 11, Title 38, U. S. C. A., which is the Act of Congress of the United States as amended July 3, 1926, Chapter 751, §3-a, 44 Statutes, 827.

This court has held in the case of Ramisch v Fulton, Supt. of Banks, 41 Oh Ap 443, (11 Abs 346), 180 NE, 735, and in the case of Fulton, Supt. of Banks v Ferguson, 44 Oh Ap, 365, (13 Abs 330), that a preference should be allowed because of the peculiar…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ramisch v. Fulton, Supt. of Bks.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1932
  2. Fulton, Supt. of Bks. v. FergusonOhio Court of Appeals · 1932
  3. Fulton, Supt. of Bks. v. StempienOhio Court of Appeals · 1932
  4. Fulton v. CampbellOhio Court of Appeals · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API