Legal Opinion
Ramisch v. Fulton, Supt. of Bks.
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided January 11, 1932No. 2621PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLloyd, J.
By §618, Part 5, Chapter 11, Title 38, U. S. Code, it is provided that:
“No sum payable under this chapter to a veteran or his dependents, or to his estate, or to any beneficiary named under Part V oí this chapter, .no adjusted service certificate, and no proceeds of any loan made on such certificate shall be subject to attachment, levy or seizure under any legal or equitable process, or to national or state taxation, and no deductions on account of any indebtedness of the veteran to the United States shall be made from the adjusted service creditor or from any amounts due under this chapter.”
T…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Matter of Cavin v. . GleasonNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
- The SaratogaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1881
3Cited by11 opinions
- Anderson v. Olivia State BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
- Nelson v. John B. Colegrove & Co. State BankAppellate Court of Illinois · 1932
- Arend v. Fulton, Supt. of BanksOhio Court of Appeals · 1936
- Board of Twp. Trustees v. Gray, Supt.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1933
- Fulton, Supt. of Bks. v. FergusonOhio Court of Appeals · 1932
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.