Legal Opinion

Fulton v. Campbell

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided December 19, 1932No. Nos 2722, 2723 & 2724PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

BY THE COURT

In the Campbell and Buckenmyer cases the accounts being commercial accounts, there was no interest payable, but in our judgment the identity of the fund was lost by reason of the fact of commingling the fund with other funds in a checking or commercial account. In the Samiec case the identity of the fund was lost by reason of the fact that it was loaned to the bank for interest, the same being a savings account. In our judgment, a deposit of a loan on an adjusted service certificate in a savings account at interest is of itself sufficient to destroy the identity of the fund and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Fulton, Supt. of Bks. v. StempienOhio Court of Appeals · 1932

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Flory v. FultonOhio Court of Appeals · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API