Legal Opinion

Fulton, Supt. of Bks. v. Ferguson

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided December 19, 1932No. 530PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRichards, J.

Following the statutory requirement, the pleading must be liberally construed, and so construed it states a good cause of action.

It will be observed from the' averments of the pleading that the claimant has not mingled any other money with the deposit which he made of the proceeds of his bonus certificate, and that the same was not deposited in a savings department of the bank nor on interest. The identity of the fund has thus been preserved and the claim is entitled to preference under the Federal statute. The judgment allowing the preference must be affirmed on authority of Ramisch v…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Ramisch v. Fulton, Supt. of Bks.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1932

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Flory v. FultonOhio Court of Appeals · 1934
  2. Knott v. Toledo Edison Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API