Dahlke v. Dahlke

*566Gordon, J.

There are two basic grounds upon which we conclude that the trial court’s analysis was correct. First, the history of both the distribution and the retention of the company’s stock is more logically consistent with the respondents’ position. Secondly, we are unable to locate proof of any donative intent to support the alleged gift.

History of Shareholdings.

At the beginning of this report, we have recited in some detail the historical aspects of the corporate shares starting in 1917. It is our conclusion that a study of such transfers and corresponding retentions of shares…