Legal Opinion

Stein v. Soref

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided May 3, 1949PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFritz, J.

On the trial of this action the following facts were established without dispute: In December, 1944, Sam Bass and Samuel Soref contracted to purchase the real property involved herein at the price of $45,000 and they arranged to have the title thereto conveyed to the defendant Bernard Soref, a brother of Samuel Soref. He offered defendant the opportunity to acquire half of Samuel Soref’s one-half interest in the property for $11,250 as one fourth of the $45,000 purchase price. Pursuant to said arrangement title to the property was conveyed to defendant, who duly conveyed an undivided one-half…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Beatty v. . Guggenheim Exploration Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1919
  2. Krzysko v. GaudynskiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Langley v. SanbornWisconsin Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Schofield v. RideoutWisconsin Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Scheuer v. CochemWisconsin Supreme Court · 1905

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Dahlke v. DahlkeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Thorp Sales Corp. v. LeaseWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Dahlke v. DahlkeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Leonard Bursten v. Tom Sawyer, Inc., Formerly Sawyer Downtown, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API