State v. Fortman
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WOZNIAK, Chief Judge.
Appellant Larry Lew Fortman challenges his convictions for second degree assault and terroristic threats in violation of Minn. Stat. §§ 609.222 and 609.713, subd. 1 (1990) respectively. Fortman claims the trial court erred by refusing to give a voluntary intoxication instruction for the second degree assault charge and improperly imposed consecutive sentences. We affirm in part, vacate in part and remand.
FACTS
This case arose from a series of incidents on Thanksgiving day, November 28, 1989, in Lindstrom, Minnesota. On that day, Joan Chandler had dinner with her…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- State v. DanielsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- City of Minneapolis v. AltimusSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- State v. RuudSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- State v. LindahlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. FleckSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
- State v. BjergumCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2009
- State v. FleckCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2011
- State v. CoggerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2011