Legal Opinion

Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Michael J. Briggs

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 28, 2014No. 2014AP001443-DPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

¶ 1. We review the stipulation filed by the Office of Lawyer Regulation (OLR) and Attorney Michael J. Briggs pursuant to Supreme Court Rule (SCR) 22.12. On June 24, 2014, the OLR filed a complaint in this court alleging 12 counts of misconduct against Attorney Briggs. Attorney Briggs did not file an answer, but instead he and the OLR filed a stipulation in which Attorney Briggs admitted the facts and misconduct as alleged in the OLR's complaint and agreed to the level of discipline sought by the OLR: a 90-day suspension of Attorney Briggs's license to practice law in this state.

¶ 2. We…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Disciplinary Proceedings Against ScanlanWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. KelsayWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against FitzgeraldWisconsin Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. FarrisWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Alfredson (In Re Alfredson)Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2019
  2. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Grass (In Re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Gary E. Grass)Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API