Legal Opinion

Gordon Form Lathe Co. v. Walcott MacH. Co.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided April 12, 1929No. 5111PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HICKENLOOPER, Circuit Judge.

The appellant originally instituted its action in equity in the District Court for an injunction and accounting for alleged infringement of patent No. 1,542,803, issued Juno 16, 1925, upon application of Charles Gordon and Alfred W. Redlin, filed July 19, 1920, for a lathe. The District Court found the claims in issue valid, but not infringed. ' The parties to this appeal will be referred to by the designations of complainant and defendant, by which they were known in the court below. Claims 1, 2,12, 23, 24, 28-30, 33, 34, and 39-42 are in issue.

The patent in suit…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Eibel Process Co. v. Minnesota & Ontario Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
  2. Diamond Rubber Co. of New York v. Consolidated Rubber Tire Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
  3. MacHine Co. v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  4. Topliff v. TopliffSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  5. Boyden Power-Brake Co. v. Westinghouse Westinghouse v. Boyden Power-Brake Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Gillman v. SternCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1940
  2. Trabon Engineering Corporation v. DirkesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1943
  3. Cleveland Trust Co. v. Schriber-Schroth Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1937
  4. Gairing Tool Co. v. Eclipse Interchangeable Counterbore Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1931
  5. National Battery Co. v. Richardson Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1933

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API