Legal Opinion
Gairing Tool Co. v. Eclipse Interchangeable Counterbore Co.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided April 7, 1931No. 5530, 5531PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HICKENLOOPER, Circuit Judge.
The appellee complained in the court below of the infringement of its patent re-issue No. 16,817, issued December 13, 1927, upon application of John Hugo Smith, for a reaming and counterboring tool. All nine claims of the pate.nt were in issue. Claims 1 and 4 may be 'taken as typical of the two classes covered, and are printed in the margin. 1 It will be noted that they differ only in that claim 4 (with which claim 6 is to be aligned) requires that the ribs of smaller radii shall number at least three, to pilot the cutting ribs of larger radii. The other claims…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- The Barbed Wire PatentSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Diamond Rubber Co. of New York v. Consolidated Rubber Tire Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Smith v. Goodyear Dental Vulcanite Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Concrete Appliances Co. v. GomerySupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Hildreth v. MastorasSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Hoeltke v. C. M. Kemp Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1936
- Ric-Wil Co. v. E. B. Kaiser Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1950
- Cold Metal Process Co. v. Republic Steel Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1956
- Rome Grader & MacHinery Corp. v. J. D. Adams Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1943
- Steiner Sales Co. v. Schwartz Sales Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1938
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.