Legal Opinion
Cleveland Trust Co. v. Schriber-Schroth Co.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided October 8, 1937No. 7223-7225PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SIMONS, Circuit Judge.
In a study of the patents and prior art involved in Waukesha Motor Co. v. Wil-lys-Overland, Inc. (C.C.A.) 77 F.(2d) 906, and Perfect Circle Co. v. Hastings Mfg. Co. (C.C.A.) 88 F.(2d) 813, we learned something of the principles of operation and the mechanics employed in the conventional four-cycle internal combustion engine of the modern motor car. It will therefore be unnecessary here to repeat what was there said in reference thereto. In the first we considered the explosion chamber, and in the second the piston ring. In the present infringement suit we deal with the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- The Barbed Wire PatentSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Eibel Process Co. v. Minnesota & Ontario Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Radio Corp. of America v. Radio Engineering Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Crown Die & Tool Co. v. Nye Tool & MacHine WorksSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Kendall v. WinsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1859
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Schriber-Schroth Co. v. Cleveland Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Schriber-Schroth Co. v. Cleveland Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- In Re Yarn Processing Patent Validity Litigation. Sauquoit Fibers Company v. Leesona Corporation, Kayser-Roth Corporation (In Its Own Name and D/B/A Kayser-Roth Hosiery Companyand Kayser-Roth Hosiery Co., Inc.) v. Leesona Corporation, Leesona Corporation v. The Duplan CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- Aluminum Co. of America v. Thompson Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1941
- Horvath v. McCord Radiator & Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1938
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.