Stone v. Bonaparte
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the CourtAndrews, J.
There' are two propositions involved in this appeal. The first involves a levy of 6.94 mills for the current expense fund of the city of Oklahoma City for the fiscal year commencing July 1, 1926, and the second a' levy of .45 mill for a library fund for the same city for the same fiscal year. The trial court held (hose levies valid in all respects by virtue of certain elections wherein the voters authorized the increase over and above the statutory limitation on the maximum rate of levy for current expense purposes. An appeal was taken from that judgment by the protestant. The parties will be…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Oklahoma City v. ShieldsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
- Oklahoma News Co. v. RyanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Foot v. Town of WatongaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Ryan v. Roach Drug Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
- Grubb v. SmileySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Campbell v. CornishSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
- Johnson v. State Election BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1962
- Application of City Council of City of TahlequahSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1955
- State Ex Rel. City of Shawnee v. WilliamsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
- GJA v. Oklahoma Department of Human ServicesCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2015