Hartman v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of Review
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge Doyle,
This is an appeal by Francis Hartman (Claimant) from the order of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review which affirmed the decision of a referee to deny unemployment compensation benefits pursuant to Section 402(e) of the Unemployment Compensation Law.1
Claimant was employed by Proctor & Gamble Paper Products Company (Employer) for ten years as a janitor. On his last day of work, May 6, 1980, Claimant was fired because he dry-buffed a floor. Employer had frequently instructed Claimant that floors must be spray-buffed since this method does not remove all the wax…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Frumento v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Lake v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Gane v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Tisak v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Gusoff v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
3Cited by5 opinions
- Pearson v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
- Hager v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Pryor v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Spiropoulos v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Tyler Transport and Towing, LLC v. UCBRCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2016