Legal Opinion

Tisak v. Commonwealth

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 30, 1981No. Appeal, No. 1289 C.D. 1979PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Mencer,

Stephen Tisak (petitioner) has appealed from a decision of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review (Board) which denied benefits pursuant to Section 402(e) of the Unemployment Compensation Law, Act of December 5, 1936, Second Ex. Sess., P.L. (1937) 2897, as amended, 43 P.S. §802(e) (dealing with willful misconduct). We affirm.

Based upon substantial evidence, the referee found:

1. Claimant was last employed by Townsend & Bottum, Inc. as a truck driver at a base pay of $9.15 per hour from June 20, 1978 until January 18, 1979 his last day of work.

2. On January 18,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Lake v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  2. Elshinnawy v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  3. Belton v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Cundiff v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  2. Viglino v. UN. COMP. BD. OF REV.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  3. Webb v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  4. Hartman v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  5. Dearolf v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API