Frumento v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
NIX, Justice.
This appeal arises under the Unemployment Compensation Law, Act of December 5, 1936, P.L. [1937] 2897, *83as amended, 43 P.S. § 751 et seq. The specific question is whether appellant-employee was properly excluded from benefits under this Act because of a termination of employment as a result of “willful misconduct” in accordance with section 402 (e), 43 P.S. § 802(e).
Appellant’s application for unemployment compensation benefits was denied by the Bureau of Employment Security premised upon a determination that his discharge was as a result of willful misconduct.…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Henry v. Pittsb. Etc. R.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1891
- Wedner Unemployment Compensation CaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
- Department of Labor & Industry v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
- Lattanzio v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Davis Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by252 opinions
- Guthrie v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- McLean v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Miller v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Walsh v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
- Docherty v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
247 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.