City of Hot Springs v. Creviston
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
George Rose Smith, Justice.
This is a taxpayer’s suit attacking the validity of a $3,000,000 municipal bond issue that was sold primarily to pay existing obligations of Magic Springs Theme Park, a privately owned amusement park in or near the City of Hot Springs. Creviston’s complaint for a declaratory judgment and injunctive relief was filed in 1984 against the four appellants: the City of Hot Springs, its Advertising & Tourist Promotion Commission, and two Hot Springs banks. After an extensive trial the chancellor held that the bonds are invalid, for three reasons: The bonds were not issued…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Snodgrass v. PocahontasSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1934
- Jackson v. Kinark Corp.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1984
- Matter of Estate of EppersonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1984
- Purvis v. City of Little RockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1984
- Purvis v. HubbellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1981
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by57 opinions
- Arnold v. KempSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
- Cotten v. FooksSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
- Lake View School District No. 25 v. HuckabeeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
- Brandon v. Arkansas Public Service CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1999
- Hayes v. State Property & Buildings CommissionKentucky Supreme Court · 1987
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.