Legal Opinion

City of Hot Springs v. Creviston

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 3, 1986No. 85-237PublishedCited by 57 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

George Rose Smith, Justice.

This is a taxpayer’s suit attacking the validity of a $3,000,000 municipal bond issue that was sold primarily to pay existing obligations of Magic Springs Theme Park, a privately owned amusement park in or near the City of Hot Springs. Creviston’s complaint for a declaratory judgment and injunctive relief was filed in 1984 against the four appellants: the City of Hot Springs, its Advertising & Tourist Promotion Commission, and two Hot Springs banks. After an extensive trial the chancellor held that the bonds are invalid, for three reasons: The bonds were not issued…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Snodgrass v. PocahontasSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1934
  2. Jackson v. Kinark Corp.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1984
  3. Matter of Estate of EppersonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1984
  4. Purvis v. City of Little RockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1984
  5. Purvis v. HubbellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1981

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by57 opinions

  1. Arnold v. KempSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
  2. Cotten v. FooksSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
  3. Lake View School District No. 25 v. HuckabeeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
  4. Brandon v. Arkansas Public Service CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1999
  5. Hayes v. State Property & Buildings CommissionKentucky Supreme Court · 1987

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API