Legal Opinion

Jackson v. Kinark Corp.

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided June 4, 1984No. 84-104PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

George Rose Smith, Justice.

In March, 1981, the appellant, Michael Jackson, was employed by the appellee to be a banquet server at the Camelot Hotel in Little Rock. Fourteen months later Jackson was discharged for refusing to take a polygraph test in connection with the disappearance of a television set at the hotel. Jackson brought this action for damages, both in contract and in tort, alleging that his discharge was wrongful and abusive. The trial court granted a motion for summary judgment on the contract claim, holding that the complaint did not state a cause of action because Jackson’s…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Griffin v. EricksonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1982
  2. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. MatthewsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1897
  3. Petty v. Missouri & Arkansas Railway Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1943

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Sterling Drug, Inc. v. OxfordSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
  2. Smith v. American Greetings Corp.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
  3. Crain Industries, Inc. v. CassSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
  4. Gladden v. Arkansas Children's HospitalSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987
  5. City of Hot Springs v. CrevistonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1986

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API