Jacoby v. Parkland Distilling Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Plaintiff, alleging herself to be the owner of the undivided one-half of lot 7, block 108, in Minneapolis, according to the original plat, occupied by herself and tenants, brought this action in the district court for Hennepin county, to determine the adverse claims of the-defendants to interests in and liens on the property. The answering defendants asserted liens on the premises as judgment creditors of George G. Jacoby, plaintiff’s husband.
Read the full summary
Plaintiff, alleging herself to be the owner of the undivided one-half of lot 7, block 108, in Minneapolis, according to the original plat, occupied by herself and tenants, brought this action in the district court for Hennepin county, to determine the adverse claims of the-defendants to interests in and liens on the property. The answering defendants asserted liens on the premises as judgment creditors of George G. Jacoby, plaintiff’s husband. The action was tried by Young, J., who found that from a date long prior to January 1,1887, until August 8,. 1888, George G. Jacoby owned in fee (his…
1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.
The evidence offered by the defendants, the exclusion of which is here assigned as error, may all be classified under two heads: First, evidence tending to prove that George G. Jacoby, an insolvent debtor, in contemplation of insolvency, moved into and made his dwelling in the property in controversy, which constituted & large part of his assets, for the express purpose of holding it as a homestead and thereby withdrawing it from the reach of his creditors; and, second, that in a financial statement made to defendants, and upon the faith of which they gave him credit for the claims upon which…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Taylor v. TaylorSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1865
- O'Donnell v. SegarMichigan Supreme Court · 1872
- Randall v. BuffingtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1858
- Umland v. HolcombeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1879
- North v. ShearnTexas Supreme Court · 1855
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- In Re HaggertySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
- In Re TvetenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
- Panuska v. Johnson (In Re Johnson)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 1987
- First Nat. Bank v. GlassCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1897
- Smith v. Guckenheimer & SonsSupreme Court of Florida · 1900
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.